You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants of Inappropriate Antibiotics Use in Rural Central Ghana Using a Mixed Methods Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00090 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Afari-Asiedu, Felix Boakye Oppong, Alma Tostmann, Martha Ali Abdulai, Ellen Boamah-Kaali, Stephaney Gyaase, Oscar Agyei, John Kinsman, Marlies Hulscher, Heiman F. L. Wertheim, Kwaku Poku Asante |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 67% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 61 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#976,611
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#454
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,720
of 370,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#12
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.