You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Special Report: The Biology of Inequalities in Health: The Lifepath Consortium
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00118 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paolo Vineis, Mauricio Avendano-Pabon, Henrique Barros, Mel Bartley, Cristian Carmeli, Luca Carra, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Giuseppe Costa, Cyrille Delpierre, Angelo D'Errico, Silvia Fraga, Graham Giles, Marcel Goldberg, Michelle Kelly-Irving, Mika Kivimaki, Benoit Lepage, Thierry Lang, Richard Layte, Frances MacGuire, Johan P. Mackenbach, Michael Marmot, Cathal McCrory, Roger L. Milne, Peter Muennig, Wilma Nusselder, Dusan Petrovic, Silvia Polidoro, Fulvio Ricceri, Oliver Robinson, Silvia Stringhini, Marie Zins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
Ireland | 4 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 31 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 44 | 63% |
Scientists | 18 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 20% |
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Professor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 51 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Other | 26 | 19% |
Unknown | 59 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#905,304
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#477
of 14,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,973
of 421,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#15
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.