↓ Skip to main content

Medical Device Development Process, and Associated Risks and Legislative Aspects-Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical Device Development Process, and Associated Risks and Legislative Aspects-Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra Marešová, Blanka Klímová, Jan Honegr, Kamil Kuča, Wan Nur Hidayah Ibrahim, Ali Selamat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 8 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Unspecified 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 60 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Unspecified 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 62 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,461,180
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,439
of 13,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,191
of 405,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#97
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.