↓ Skip to main content

When Second Best Might Be the Best: Using Hospitalization Data to Monitor the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
When Second Best Might Be the Best: Using Hospitalization Data to Monitor the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Mallow, Michael Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Design 2 5%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,616,469
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,810
of 10,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,110
of 397,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#141
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.