| Title |
Clinical Use of Short-Course and Low-Dose Corticosteroids in Patients With Non-severe COVID-19 During Pneumonia Progression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00355 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhiliang Hu, Yanling Lv, Chuanjun Xu, Wenkui Sun, Wei Chen, Zhihang Peng, Chen Chen, Xiang Cui, Damin Jiao, Cong Cheng, Yun Chi, Hongxia Wei, Chunmei Hu, Yi Zeng, Xia Zhang, Yongxiang Yi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 17% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 41 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#13,649,172
of 24,195,945 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,169
of 12,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,995
of 401,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#89
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,195,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.