You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Utility of a Mental Health App in Apprentice Workers: A Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Deady, Nicholas Glozier, Daniel Collins, Rochelle Einboden, Isobel Lavender, Alexis Wray, Aimee Gayed, Rafael A. Calvo, Helen Christensen, Samuel B. Harvey, Isabella Choi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,711,126
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,367
of 10,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,232
of 399,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#65
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.