You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consideration of Social Disadvantages for Understanding and Preventing Obesity in Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00423 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alelí M. Ayala-Marín, Isabel Iguacel, Pilar De Miguel-Etayo, Luis A. Moreno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 27% |
| Chile | 2 | 18% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 61 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,652,696
of 25,359,594 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,712
of 13,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,380
of 407,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#62
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,359,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.