| Title |
Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19: A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00477 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jingchun Fan, Ya Gao, Na Zhao, Runjing Dai, Hailiang Zhang, Xiaoyan Feng, Guoxiu Shi, Jinhui Tian, Che Chen, Brett D. Hambly, Shisan Bao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 33% |
| Colombia | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 222 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 18 | 8% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 23% |
| Unknown | 91 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 24% |
| Unknown | 94 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,943,835
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,281
of 9,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,874
of 396,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#128
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.