↓ Skip to main content

Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19: A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19: A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingchun Fan, Ya Gao, Na Zhao, Runjing Dai, Hailiang Zhang, Xiaoyan Feng, Guoxiu Shi, Jinhui Tian, Che Chen, Brett D. Hambly, Shisan Bao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 18 8%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 52 23%
Unknown 91 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 53 24%
Unknown 94 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,943,835
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,281
of 9,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,874
of 396,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#128
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.