You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Was the Maternal Health Cash Transfer Programme in Nigeria Sustainable and Cost-Effective?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.582072 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Obinna Onwujekwe, Tim Ensor, Pamela Ogbozor, Chinyere Okeke, Uche Ezenwaka, Joseph P. Hicks, Enyi Etiaba, Benjamin Uzochukwu, Bassey Ebenso, Tolib Mirzoev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 33% |
| Nigeria | 8 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 38% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,925,954
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#749
of 10,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,139
of 420,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#52
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.