↓ Skip to main content

Training a Fit-For-Purpose Rural Health Workforce for Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): How Do Drivers and Enablers of Rural Practice Intention Differ Between Learners From LMICs and High…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training a Fit-For-Purpose Rural Health Workforce for Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): How Do Drivers and Enablers of Rural Practice Intention Differ Between Learners From LMICs and High Income Countries?
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.582464
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Johnston, Monsie Guingona, Salwa Elsanousi, Jabu Mbokazi, Charlie Labarda, Fortunato L. Cristobal, Shambhu Upadhyay, Abu-Bakr Othman, Torres Woolley, Balkrishna Acharya, John C. Hogenbirk, Sarangan Ketheesan, Jonathan C. Craig, Andre-Jacques Neusy, Sarah Larkins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 26 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 29 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,025,408
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,302
of 10,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,201
of 418,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#124
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.