↓ Skip to main content

Fake News Affecting the Adherence of National Response Measures During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period: The Experience of Vietnam

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Fake News Affecting the Adherence of National Response Measures During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period: The Experience of Vietnam
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.589872
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thao Thi Phuong Nguyen, Duy Cao Nguyen, Anh Trong Tung Nguyen, Long Hoang Nguyen, Giang Thu Vu, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Trang Ha Nguyen, Huong Thi Le

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 15 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,330,048
of 25,547,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,386
of 14,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,865
of 430,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#122
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.