You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bee Venom—A Potential Complementary Medicine Candidate for SARS-CoV-2 Infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.594458 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keneth Iceland Kasozi, Gniewko Niedbała, Mohammed Alqarni, Gerald Zirintunda, Fred Ssempijja, Simon Peter Musinguzi, Ibe Michael Usman, Kevin Matama, Helal F. Hetta, Ngala Elvis Mbiydzenyuy, Gaber El-Saber Batiha, Amany Magdy Beshbishy, Susan Christina Welburn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 7 | 11% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 92% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#608,155
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#311
of 14,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,745
of 529,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#16
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.