You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Screening of Healthcare Workers in the Southern Part of Kyoto City During the COVID-19 Pre-pandemic Period
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.595348 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kohei Fujita, Shinpei Kada, Osamu Kanai, Hiroaki Hata, Takao Odagaki, Noriko Satoh-Asahara, Tetsuya Tagami, Akihiro Yasoda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 17% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Researcher | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 24% |
Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 21% |
Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,721,250
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,290
of 10,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,559
of 508,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#177
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.