You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions: Application of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) Process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604401 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Cheng, Gerald R. Elsworth, Richard H. Osborne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Nepal | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,254,175
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,960
of 14,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,368
of 528,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#81
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.