↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED: “Recovering With Nature”: A Review of Ecotherapy and Implications for the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED: “Recovering With Nature”: A Review of Ecotherapy and Implications for the COVID-19 Pandemic
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604440
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pourabi Chaudhury, Debanjan Banerjee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 337 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 15%
Student > Master 35 10%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 135 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 12%
Psychology 36 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 146 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#650,346
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#336
of 14,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,927
of 528,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#19
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.