You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rita Daubner-Bendes, Sándor Kovács, Maciej Niewada, Mirjana Huic, Michael Drummond, Oriana Ciani, Carl Rudolf Blankart, Olena Mandrik, Aleksandra Torbica, John Yfantopoulos, Guenka Petrova, Malwina Holownia-Voloskova, Rod S. Taylor, Maiwenn Al, Oresta Piniazhko, László Lorenzovici, Rosanna Tarricone, Antal Zemplényi, Zoltán Kaló |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Italy | 1 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,139,320
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,402
of 10,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,181
of 502,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#142
of 408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.