You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Applying the Realist Evaluation Approach to the Complex Process of Policy Implementation—The Case of the User Fee Exemption Policy for Cesarean Section in Benin
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.553980 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean-Paul Dossou, Sara Van Belle, Bruno Marchal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 13% |
Switzerland | 2 | 13% |
Burkina Faso | 1 | 7% |
Belgium | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Ghana | 1 | 7% |
Senegal | 1 | 7% |
Benin | 1 | 7% |
France | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 23% |
Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,276,885
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,255
of 10,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,411
of 445,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#80
of 619 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 619 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.