You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Allows for Up to 10-Fold Efficiency Increase Across Realistic Scenarios and Testing Strategies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.583377 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudio M. Verdun, Tim Fuchs, Pavol Harar, Dennis Elbrächter, David S. Fischer, Julius Berner, Philipp Grohs, Fabian J. Theis, Felix Krahmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 23% |
Unknown | 26 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 29 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,716,607
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,411
of 12,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,044
of 421,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#150
of 589 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 589 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.