↓ Skip to main content

Full Comprehension of Theories, Models, and Frameworks Improves Application: A Focus on RE-AIM

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Full Comprehension of Theories, Models, and Frameworks Improves Application: A Focus on RE-AIM
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.599975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Lee Smith, Samantha M. Harden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 24%
Unspecified 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#13,578,800
of 24,229,740 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,135
of 12,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,270
of 425,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#156
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,229,740 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.