↓ Skip to main content

Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study Protocol Among Advanced Lung Cancer Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study Protocol Among Advanced Lung Cancer Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.622154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilaria Durosini, Rosanne Janssens, Reinhard Arnou, Jorien Veldwijk, Meredith Y. Smith, Dario Monzani, Ian Smith, Giulia Galli, Marina Garassino, Eva G. Katz, Luca Bailo, Evelyne Louis, Marie Vandevelde, Kristiaan Nackaerts, G. Ardine de Wit, Gabriella Pravettoni, Isabelle Huys

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 22 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,496,406
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,423
of 14,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,151
of 538,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#112
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 538,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.