↓ Skip to main content

Respect Is Central: A Critical Review of Implementation Frameworks for Continuous Quality Improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care Services

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Respect Is Central: A Critical Review of Implementation Frameworks for Continuous Quality Improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care Services
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.630611
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Redman-MacLaren, Nalita Nungarrayi Turner, Judy Taylor, Alison Laycock, Kristina Vine, Quitaysha Thompson, Sarah Larkins, Karen Carlisle, Sandra Thompson, Ross Bailie, Veronica Matthews

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Librarian 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 18 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 20 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#20,707,815
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#8,016
of 10,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,980
of 435,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#467
of 624 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 624 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.