↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Organization of COVID-19 Data Supported by the Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Organization of COVID-19 Data Supported by the Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.638605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Penny Nymark, Magdalini Sachana, Sofia Batista Leite, Jukka Sund, Catharine E. Krebs, Kristie Sullivan, Stephen Edwards, Laura Viviani, Catherine Willett, Brigitte Landesmann, Clemens Wittwehr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Design 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,382,306
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,423
of 12,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,556
of 434,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#75
of 569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.