You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Plandemic Revisited: A Product of Planned Disinformation Amplifying the COVID-19 “infodemic”
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.649930 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shahin Nazar, Toine Pieters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 242 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 58 | 24% |
Australia | 18 | 7% |
Canada | 12 | 5% |
Comoros | 2 | <1% |
Bulgaria | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
Singapore | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 4% |
Unknown | 132 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 209 | 86% |
Scientists | 25 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 24% |
Unknown | 45 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 15 | 14% |
Computer Science | 8 | 8% |
Psychology | 7 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 48 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 207. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#192,768
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#119
of 14,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,487
of 448,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#6
of 630 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 630 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.