↓ Skip to main content

Logically Inferred Tuberculosis Transmission (LITT): A Data Integration Algorithm to Rank Potential Source Cases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Logically Inferred Tuberculosis Transmission (LITT): A Data Integration Algorithm to Rank Potential Source Cases
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.667337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Winglee, Clinton J. McDaniel, Lauren Linde, Steve Kammerer, Martin Cilnis, Kala M. Raz, Wendy Noboa, Jillian Knorr, Lauren Cowan, Sue Reynolds, James Posey, Jeanne Sullivan Meissner, Shameer Poonja, Tambi Shaw, Sarah Talarico, Benjamin J. Silk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,638,629
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,671
of 14,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,182
of 459,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#150
of 632 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 632 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.