You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lay Public View of Neuroscience and Science-Based Brain Health Recommendations in Slovenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.690421 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nastja Tomat, Matej Perovnik, Gaj Vidmar, Vesna van Midden, Sara Fabjan, Hana Hawlina, Dolores Trol, Alina Holnthaner, Sebastijan Krajnc, Maruša Grešak, Liza Žerdin, Judita Vidmar, Mara Bresjanac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#13,748,377
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,313
of 10,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,607
of 442,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#228
of 623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.