↓ Skip to main content

Has COVID-19 Changed the Hedge Effectiveness of Bitcoin?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Has COVID-19 Changed the Hedge Effectiveness of Bitcoin?
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.704900
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yinpeng Zhang, Panpan Zhu, Yingying Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 12 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 21%
Unspecified 2 7%
Mathematics 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#8,016
of 10,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,469
of 433,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#455
of 609 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 609 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.