You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugo C. Turner, Rachel A. Archer, Laura E. Downey, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Kalipso Chalkidou, Mark Jit, Yot Teerawattananon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 29% |
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 8% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Zambia | 1 | 4% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 46% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 324 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 172 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 182 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,447,256
of 25,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#717
of 14,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,313
of 433,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#32
of 569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.