You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of the COVID-19 Real-Time Information System for Preparedness and Epidemic Response (CRISPER), Australia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.753493 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emma Field, Amalie Dyda, Michael Hewett, Haotian Weng, Jingjing Shi, Stephanie Curtis, Charlee Law, Lisa McHugh, Meru Sheel, Jess Moore, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Priyanka Pillai, Paul Konings, Michael Purcell, Nigel Stocks, Graham Williams, Colleen L. Lau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 60% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 78% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 18 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,978,798
of 24,115,737 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,387
of 12,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,049
of 427,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#209
of 711 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,115,737 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 711 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.