↓ Skip to main content

Naturalistic randomized controlled trial demonstrating effectiveness of Text4Hope in supporting male population mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Naturalistic randomized controlled trial demonstrating effectiveness of Text4Hope in supporting male population mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reham Shalaby, Belinda Agyapong, Wesley Vuong, Marianne Hrabok, April Gusnowski, Shireen Surood, Andrew J. Greenshaw, Vincent I. O. Agyapong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,297,447
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,356
of 11,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,188
of 437,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#456
of 1,412 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,412 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.