You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mitigating co-circulation of seasonal influenza and COVID-19 pandemic in the presence of vaccination: A mathematical modeling approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086849 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bushra Majeed, Jummy Funke David, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Zack McCarthy, Martin David Grunnill, Jane Heffernan, Jianhong Wu, Woldegebriel Assefa Woldegerima |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,828,985
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,303
of 13,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,734
of 475,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#66
of 1,285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.