You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.787135 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Gentili, Giovanna Failla, Andriy Melnyk, Valeria Puleo, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Walter Ricciardi, Fidelia Cascini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 106 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 106 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,197,291
of 23,856,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#529
of 11,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,713
of 418,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#29
of 1,286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,856,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.