You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of Population Screening Programs for Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.820750 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manushi Sharma, Renu John, Sadia Afrin, Xinyi Zhang, Tengyi Wang, Maoyi Tian, Kirti Sundar Sahu, Robert Mash, Devarsetty Praveen, K. M. Saif-Ur-Rahman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,766,556
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,791
of 13,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,612
of 436,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#122
of 929 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 929 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.