You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global COVID-19 Vaccine Inequity: Failures in the First Year of Distribution and Potential Solutions for the Future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.821117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Pilkington, Sarai Mirjam Keestra, Andrew Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#567,637
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#291
of 14,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,131
of 450,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#19
of 947 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 947 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.