You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vaccine Hesitancy Among Religious Groups: Reasons Underlying This Phenomenon and Communication Strategies to Rebuild Trust
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.824560 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annie Kibongani Volet, Cristina Scavone, Daniel Catalán-Matamoros, Annalisa Capuano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 21% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,209,507
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,479
of 14,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,016
of 520,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#83
of 841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.