You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping Cancer in Africa: A Comprehensive and Comparable Characterization of 34 Cancer Types Using Estimates From GLOBOCAN 2020
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.839835 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rajesh Sharma, Aashima, Mehak Nanda, Claudio Fronterre, Paul Sewagudde, Anna E. Ssentongo, Kelsey Yenney, Nina D. Arhin, John Oh, Forster Amponsah-Manu, Paddy Ssentongo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 85 | 37% |
| United States | 10 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Comoros | 2 | <1% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 111 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 200 | 86% |
| Scientists | 17 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 278 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 128 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 132 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 286. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#125,364
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#88
of 14,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,979
of 448,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#6
of 1,094 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,094 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.