You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Public Views About Involvement in Decision-Making on Health Data Sharing, Access, Use and Reuse: The Importance of Trust in Science and Other Institutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.852971 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ngozi Nwebonyi, Susana Silva, Cláudia de Freitas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 22% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,821,191
of 24,089,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,019
of 12,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,292
of 429,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#128
of 1,124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,089,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.