↓ Skip to main content

Lower Subjective Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Increased Risk of Reporting Negative Experiences on Social Media. Findings From the “LifeOnSoMe”-Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lower Subjective Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Increased Risk of Reporting Negative Experiences on Social Media. Findings From the “LifeOnSoMe”-Study
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.873463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Christoffer Skogen, Tormod Bøe, Turi Reiten Finserås, Børge Sivertsen, Randi Træland Hella, Gunnhild Johnsen Hjetland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Librarian 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 24 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 25 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,558,751
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,259
of 13,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,117
of 435,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#392
of 1,234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.