You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing the incidence, hospitalization, and mortality from COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.873596 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazem Rahmani, Rasoul Shavaleh, Mahtab Forouhi, Hamideh Feiz Disfani, Mostafa Kamandi, Rozita Khatamian Oskooi, Molood Foogerdi, Moslem Soltani, Maryam Rahchamani, Mohammad Mohaddespour, Mostafa Dianatinasab |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% |
| Australia | 10 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Poland | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 102 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 149 | 86% |
| Scientists | 10 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#248,592
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#156
of 14,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,992
of 431,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#12
of 1,334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.