↓ Skip to main content

Side Effects of COVID-19 Inactivated Virus vs. Adenoviral Vector Vaccines: Experience of Algerian Healthcare Workers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Side Effects of COVID-19 Inactivated Virus vs. Adenoviral Vector Vaccines: Experience of Algerian Healthcare Workers
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.896343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed Lounis, Mohammed Amir Rais, Djihad Bencherit, Hani Amir Aouissi, Adda Oudjedi, Jitka Klugarová, Andrea Pokorná, Miloslav Klugar, Abanoub Riad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Researcher 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,882,320
of 24,198,461 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,778
of 12,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,844
of 431,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#355
of 1,115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,198,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.