You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Application of Serious Games in Health Care: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.896974 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yue Wang, Zhao Wang, Guoqing Liu, Zhangyi Wang, Qinglong Wang, Yishan Yan, Jing Wang, Yue Zhu, Weijie Gao, Xiangling Kan, Zhiguo Zhang, Lixia Jia, Xiaoli Pang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,506,566
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,507
of 10,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,009
of 442,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#171
of 1,241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.