↓ Skip to main content

Using and improving the PHISICC paper-based tools in the health facility laboratories: Examples of Human Centered Design taking systems thinking into practice, in Côte d'Ivoire and Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using and improving the PHISICC paper-based tools in the health facility laboratories: Examples of Human Centered Design taking systems thinking into practice, in Côte d'Ivoire and Nigeria
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.916397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nnette Ekpenyong, Kathrin Heitz Tokpa, Ogonna Nwankwo, David O'Donnell, Damaris Rodriguez Franco, Salimata Berté, Simplice Amani Kouassi, Glory Eteng, Veronica Undelikwo, Christian Auer, Gouzan Bernard Guessan Bi, Angela Oyo-Ita, Xavier Bosch-Capblanch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 18 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,121,445
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,539
of 10,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,987
of 433,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#313
of 1,374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.