You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Marital Status and Gender Differences as Key Determinants of COVID-19 Impact on Wellbeing, Job Satisfaction and Resilience in Health Care Workers and Staff Working in Academia in the UK During the First Wave of the Pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.928107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junjie Peng, Han Wu, Georgia Doolan, Naila Choudhury, Puja Mehta, Ayesha Khatun, Laura Hennelly, Julian Henty, Elizabeth C. Jury, Lih-Mei Liao, Coziana Ciurtin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Professor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,005,998
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,187
of 11,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,995
of 441,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#81
of 1,261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.