You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness and feasibility of self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing for internet-based cervical cancer screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.938272 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jingran Li, Ruifang Wu, Xinfeng Qu, Xia Huang, Ling Li, Zhixin Lin, Zhijun Zhang, Jihong Deng, Rong Liu, Xiaofeng Zhao, Songling Zhang, Bei Lin, Ruifang An, Chao Zhao, Mingzhu Li, Yun Zhao, Lihui Wei |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 17% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,475,076
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,463
of 13,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,644
of 436,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#283
of 1,524 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,524 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.