You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Parallel randomized controlled feasibility trials of the “Active Brains” digital intervention to protect cognitive health in adults aged 60–85
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.962873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosie Essery, Sebastien Pollet, Katherine Bradbury, Max J. Western, Elisabeth Grey, James Denison-Day, Kirsten A. Smith, Victoria Hayter, Joanne Kelly, Jane Somerville, Beth Stuart, Taeko Becque, Jin Zhang, Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz, Fiona Mowbray, Anne Ferrey, Guiqing Yao, Shihua Zhu, Tony Kendrick, Simon Griffin, Nanette Mutrie, Sian Robinson, Helen Brooker, Gareth Griffiths, Louise Robinson, Martin Rossor, Clive Ballard, John Gallacher, Shanaya Rathod, Bernard Gudgin, Rosemary Phillips, Tom Stokes, John Niven, Paul Little, Lucy Yardley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 75% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,621,904
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,689
of 11,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,359
of 436,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#121
of 1,381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.