You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nurses' knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.964680 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Wu, Bangjun Wang, Liping Zhu, Xiaoli Jia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,330,318
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,985
of 11,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,762
of 434,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#240
of 1,389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.