You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intrapersonal and interpersonal level factors influencing self-care practices among Hong Kong individuals with COVID-19—A qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.964944 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haixia Ma, Yajing Ma, Song Ge, Shanshan Wang, Ivy Yan Zhao, Martin Christensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#13,298,680
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,935
of 10,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,361
of 432,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#222
of 1,339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.