You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of two technology-enhanced diabetes prevention programs in primary care: The DiaBEAT-it study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1000162 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabio A. Almeida, Wen You, Fabiana A. Brito, Thais F. Alves, Cody Goessl, Sarah S. Wall, Richard W. Seidel, Brenda M. Davy, Mark H. Greenawald, Jennie L. Hill, Paul A. Estabrooks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,812,371
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#8,057
of 11,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,546
of 325,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#462
of 1,065 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,065 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.