You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Agile Co-production and Evaluation framework for developing public health interventions, messaging and guidance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1094753 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy Yardley, Sarah Denford, Atiya Kamal, Tom May, Jo M. Kesten, Clare E French, Dale Weston, G. James Rubin, Jeremy Horwood, Matthew Hickman, Richard Amlôt, Isabel Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,307,887
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,272
of 13,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,953
of 360,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#80
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.