You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of the methods for isolation and detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in municipal wastewater
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116636 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent Lucansky, Marek Samec, Tatiana Burjanivova, Eva Lukacova, Zuzana Kolkova, Veronika Holubekova, Eva Turyova, Andrea Hornakova, Tibor Zaborsky, Petar Podlesniy, Lenka Reizigova, Zuzana Dankova, Elena Novakova, Renata Pecova, Andrea Calkovska, Erika Halasova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,121,865
of 25,069,047 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,174
of 13,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,403
of 413,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#178
of 1,166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,069,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.