You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of California COVIDNet – a multi-sector collaboration for statewide SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1249614 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debra A. Wadford, Nikki Baumrind, Elizabeth F. Baylis, John M. Bell, Ellen L. Bouchard, Megan Crumpler, Eric M. Foote, Sabrina Gilliam, Carol A. Glaser, Jill K. Hacker, Katya Ledin, Sharon L. Messenger, Christina Morales, Emily A. Smith, Joel R. Sevinsky, Russell B. Corbett-Detig, Joseph DeRisi, Kathleen Jacobson, the COVIDNet Consortium, Summer Adams, Phacharee Arunleung, Matthew Bacinskas, Nikki Baumrind, Elizabeth F. Baylis, Cynthia Bernas, John M. Bell, Ricardo Berumen, Ellen L. Bouchard, Brandon Brown, Teal Bullick, Lyndsey Chaille, Alice Chen, Giorgio Cosentino, Yocelyn Cruz, Nick D’Angelo, Mojgan Deldari, Alex Espinosa, Ambar Espinoza, Eric M. Foote, Shiffen Getabecha, Sabrina Gilliam, Carol A. Glaser, Madeleine Glenn, Bianca Gonzaga, Ydelita Gonzales, Melanie Greengard, Hugo Guevara, Jill K. Hacker, Kim Hansard, April Hatada, Monica Haw, Thalia Huynh, Kathleen Jacobson, Chantha Kath, Paul B. Kimsey, Katya Ledin, Deidra Lemoine, Ruth Lopez, Sharon L. Messenger, Blanca Molinar, Christina Morales, Samantha Munoz, Robert Nakamura, Nichole Osugi, Tasha Padilla, Chao-Yang Pan, Mayuri V. Panditrao, Chris Preas, Will Probert, Alexa Quintana, Maria Uribe-Fuentes, Mayra Ramirez, Clarence Reyes, Estela Saguar, Maria Salas, Ioana Seritan, Brandon Stavig, Hilary Tamnanchit, Serena Ting, Debra A. Wadford, Cindy Wong, Chelsea Wright, Shigeo Yagi, Venice Servellita, Alicia Sotomayor-Gonzalez, Charles Y. Chiu, Isabel Bjork, Joshua Kapp, Anouk van den Bout, Ellen Kephart, Mawadda Alnaeeli, Hau-Ling Poon, Scott Topper, Marzieh Shafii, Sara Sowko, Stephanie Trammell, Erik Wolfsohn, Patrick Ayscue, Amy Kistler, Emily Crawford, Joseph DeRisi, Cristina Tato, Valeria Arboledaz, Eleazar Eskin, Laila M. Sathe, Jacek Skarbinski, Abigail Duque, Jeffrey Schapiro, Ivy Yeung, Rama Ghatti, Zahra Shajani-Yi, Jacob M. Garrigues, Nicole Green, Peera Hemarajata, Carlos Anaya, Donna Ferguson, Beatrix Kapuszinsky, Favian Ramirez, Felipe Sta Agueda, Megan Crumpler, Julia Wolfe, Russell B. Corbett-Detig, David Haussler, Marc Perry, Jakob McBroome, Nhi Duong, Deborah Forester, Anthony Gonzalez, Maria J. Victorio, Anna Liza M. Manlutac, Jeremy Corrigan, Nicholas S. Rhoades, Lina Castro, Godfred Masinde, Harmeet Kaur, Monica Paniagua-Alexander, Katrina G. Erwin, Glen Miller, Frances N. Sidhu, Morris Jones, Sangita Kothari, Christopher Ngo, Brandon Bonin, Daniel Castillo, Rensen Khoshabian, Kristian Andersen, Mark Zeller, Lisa Critchett, Carlos Gonzalez, Iryna V. Goraichuk, Rachel Rees, Frank Ambrosio, Curtis J. Kapsak, Kevin G. Libuit, Michelle R. Scribner, Joel R. Sevinsky, Emily A. Smith, Sage M. Wright, Vanessa B. Cadiz, Denise Lopez, Matthew Rosman, Bryan Bach, Stacia Wyman, Charlotte Acharya, Ryan Davis, Richard Michelmore, Melanie Oakes, Suzanne Sandmeyer, Kathy Borkovich, Clay H. Clark, Holly Clark, Brandon Le, Peter De Hoff, Kristen Jepsen, Rob Knight, Louise C. Laurent, Zack Aralis, Carolina Arias, Varuzhan Balasanyan, Mark Duhon, Xinmin Li, Eric Chow, Nicole Leung, Delsy Martinez, Tyler T. Miyasaki, Ashlee Clow, Jared Hoffman, Thomas Rush |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 40% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,564,890
of 25,367,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,015
of 14,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,060
of 356,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#52
of 802 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,367,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 802 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.